One major requirement in piping design is to provide adequate flexibility for absorbing the thermal expansion of the pipe. However, due to lack of quick method of checking, pipings are often laid-out to be either too stiff or too flexible. In either case, valuable time and material are wasted.
This article presents some of the quick methods for checking piping flexibility. These methods include visual, hand calculation, and micro computer approaches. They are all quick and easy for designers to use in planning their layouts. Once the designers have taken care of the flexibility problem, the iterative procedure between the stress engineers and the designers become simpler. The project schedule can also be improved.
Piping flexibility
As the pipe temperature changes from the installation condition to the operating condition, it expands or contracts. In the general term, both expansion and contraction are called thermal expansion. When a pipe expands it has the potential of generating enormous force and stress in the system. However, if the piping is flexible enough, the expansion can be absorbed without creating undue force or stress. Providing the proper flexibility is one of the major tasks in the design of piping system.
Piping is used to convey a certain amount of fluid from one point to another. It is obvious that the shorter the pipe is used the lesser the capital expenditure is required. The long pipe may also generate excessive pressure drop making it unsuitable for the proper operation. However, the direct shortest layout generally is not acceptable for absorbing the thermal expansion.
Figure 1 shows what will happen when a straight pipe is directly connected from one point to another. First, consider that only one end is connected and the other end is loose. The loose end will expands an amount equal to Δ = e L
However, since the other end is not loose, this expansion is to be absorbed by the piping. This is equivalent to squeezing the pipe to move the end back an ~ distance. This amount of squczzing creates a stress of the magnitude S = E (Δ/L) = E e
Figure 1
Where, Δ = thermal expansion, in L e = expansion rate, in/in L = pipe length, in s = axial stress, psi F E = modulus of elasticity, psi A = pipe cross section area, inZ F = axial force, lbs
The force required to squeeze this amount is F = A S = A E e
Take a 6-inch standard wall carbon steel pipe for instance, an increase of temperature from 70F ambient to 300F operating creates an axial stress of 42300 psi and an axial force of 236000 lbs in the pipe. These are excessive even though the temperature is only 300F. It is clear that the straight line direct layout is not acceptable to most of the piping, Flexibility has to be provided.
Expansion loop
Piping flexibility are provided in many different ways. The turns and offsets needed for running the pipe from one point to another provides some flexibility by themself. This inherent flexibility may or may not be sufficient depending on the inpidual cases.
Additional flexibility can be provided by adding expansion loops or expansion joints. In the straight line example discussed above, the stress can be reduced by loops installed as shown below. The idea is to provide some pipe perpendicular to the direction of expansion. In this way when the pipe expands it bends the loop leg first before transmitting any load to the anchor. The longer the loop leg the lesser the force will be created.
The force created is inversely proportional to the cube of the loop length and the stress generated is roughly Hard Piping inversely proportional to the square of the loop length. The loop sometimes can take considerably more space and piping than what is available, or economically justifiable. This is especially true for large high temperature low pressure pipings.
In this case the better method is to use expansion joint. Expansion joints are more sophisticated than the pipe loops which are just extra lengths of the same piping. For this and other reasons, engineers tend to favor piping loops over expansion joints.
However, expansion joints can be used effectively in many applications when they are properly designed. One of the major requirements in the design of expansion joint system is to install sufficient restraints for maintaining the stability. This article deals mainly the loop approach.
The Critical Path
In designing a plant, the piping is generally routed or laid-out by the piping designers then checked by the stress engineers.
There is a marked difference in the layout done by the experienced and the inexperienced designers. The experienced designers know the importance of the flexibility. However, they tend to provide too much flexibility in contrast to the inexperienced ones who tend to provide little flexibility. In either case, the resulL is an over priced project.
The layout done by an inexperienced designer is normally too stiff because the designer does not know how or too timid to add loops or offsets. If a piping system is too stiff, the stress engineer will almost certain to find it out.
The stress engineer will send the design, with recommended loops, back to the designer for revision. At this time, the designer have made some more layouts in the same area making the revision very difficulty. On the other hand, a layout done by an experienced designer often contains the loops which are excessive or not needed.
The excessive loops are normally maintained without revision, becuase it is a common prctice not to change something which works. The experienced one might have saved the manhour needed for the revision. The cost of the excessive loops can be prohibitive.
The cost of the project can be reduced substantially if ~he right amount of flexibility is built in the piping at the initial layout stage. This requires some quick methods which can be used br the designers to check the piping flexibility.
Reference(s): L.C. Peng, Peng Engineering, Houston, Texas
Quick Check on Piping Flexibility
Calculating
The first step in accommodating thermal movement is to compute the exact change in the linear length of the piping system over the distance of interest, along with a suitable safety factor.
The actual expansion of 100-foot pipe lengths has been computed at different temperatures for the most common piping materials (carbon steel, stainless steel and copper tubing) and are shown in the table on the right. These values should not be applied to pipe of alternate materials as they will vary. Expansion coefficients may vary 5% or more when obtained from different sources and should be taken into account.
Thermal Expansion of Pipe Inches per 100 ft. mm per 100 metersTemp. F/CCarbon SteelCopperStainless Steel-40 -40-0.288 -24.0-0.421 -35.1-0.461 -38.4-20 -28-0.145 -12.1-0.210 -17.4-0.230 -19.00 -170 00 00 020 -60.148 12.50.238 19.70.230 19.032 00.230 19.00.366 30.50.369 30.840 40.300 24.90.451 37.70.461 38.460 150.448 37.40.684 57.10.691 57.780 260.580 48.20.896 74.80.922 76.8100 370.753 62.71.134 94.51.152 96.1120 480.910 75.81.366 113.91.382 115.2140 601.064 88.61.590 132.61.613 134.5160 711.200 100.11.804 150.31.843 153.6180 821.360 113.22.051 170.92.074 172.9200 931.520 126.62.296 191.32.304 191.9212 1001.610 134.22.428 202.42.442 203.4220 1041.680 140.12.516 209.72.534 211.3230 1101.760 146.72.636 219.82.650 220.8260 1262.020 168.3… …… …280 1372.180 181.8… …… …300 1482.350 195.9… …… …320 1602.530 211.0… …… …340 1712.700 225.1… …… …350 1762.790 232.6… …… …
An example illustrating the use of the table above follows:
Given: 240-foot long carbon steel pipe
Maximum operating temperature = 220°F (104°C)
Minimum operating temperature = 40°F (4°C)
Temperature at time of installation = 80°F (26°C)
Calculation: From the table on the right, carbon steel pipe expansion
220°F (104°C) 1.680″ per 100 ft. of carbon steel pipe
40°F (4°C) 0.300″ per 100 ft. of carbon steel pipe
Difference: 1.380″ per 100 ft. of carbon steel pipe for temperatures 40°F to 220°F
Therefore, 240-feet of pipe = 240/100 (1.380) = 3.312″
This 3.312″ of movement should have a suitable safety factor applied, which varies as determined by the system designer, to account for any errors in predicting operating extremes, etc. These examples were calculated without a safety factor applied.
To determine the positioning of the expansion joint at the time of installation:
Installation to cold condition (80°F to 40°F)
80°F (26°C) 0.580″ per 100 ft.
40°F (4°C) 0.300″ per 100 ft.
Difference: 0.280″ per 100 ft. or 0.672″ per 240 ft.
Installation to hot condition (80°F to 220°F)
220°F(104°C) 1.680″ per 100 ft.
80°F(26°C) 0.580″ per 100 ft.
Difference: 1.100″ per 100 ft. or 2.640″ per 240 ft.
Therefore, the expansion joint is to be set up with at least the capability to allow 0.672″ of pipe contraction and at least 2.640″ of pipe expansion when installed at 80°F (26°C).
Source: wermac
Commentaires